From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264213AbUHBWGS (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2004 18:06:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264238AbUHBWGS (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2004 18:06:18 -0400 Received: from the-village.bc.nu ([81.2.110.252]:29879 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264213AbUHBWGQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2004 18:06:16 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Configure IDE probe delays From: Alan Cox To: Tim Bird Cc: Todd Poynor , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Linux Kernel Mailing List , dsingleton@mvista.com, vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua, Jeff Garzik In-Reply-To: <410EB8A7.1090101@am.sony.com> References: <20040730191100.GA22201@slurryseal.ddns.mvista.com> <1091226922.5083.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> <410EB8A7.1090101@am.sony.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1091480458.1391.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 22:01:01 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Llu, 2004-08-02 at 22:56, Tim Bird wrote: > I'm still considering Jeff's comment, and I'll respond to that separately. If it's done properly everyone wins, and I suspect if you are using things like CF you will win big time using the PPC spin up delay and not waiting for disk spin up in the boot firmware.