From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266758AbUHDExP (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Aug 2004 00:53:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266846AbUHDExP (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Aug 2004 00:53:15 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:51107 "EHLO gate.crashing.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266758AbUHDExE (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Aug 2004 00:53:04 -0400 Subject: Re: Solving suspend-level confusion From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: ncunningham@linuxmail.org Cc: David Brownell , Oliver Neukum , Pavel Machek , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Patrick Mochel In-Reply-To: <1091593555.3191.48.camel@laptop.cunninghams> References: <20040730164413.GB4672@elf.ucw.cz> <200408020938.17593.david-b@pacbell.net> <1091493486.7396.92.camel@gaston> <200408031928.08475.david-b@pacbell.net> <1091586381.3189.14.camel@laptop.cunninghams> <1091587985.5226.74.camel@gaston> <1091587929.3303.38.camel@laptop.cunninghams> <1091592870.5226.80.camel@gaston> <1091593555.3191.48.camel@laptop.cunninghams> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1091595125.5227.96.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 14:52:05 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Hmm. That's what I was doing and do do for the remainder of the devices. > Oh well. I'll give it a try again. What would 3 do? (There was a stage > when all three implementations used 3; I've just played sheep in > changing to 4). 3 would be S3 -> suspend to RAM. We may still want to fix drivers to pass 4 as a PCI state though ;) > It occurs to me that I'm going to need to extend the partial tree > handling anyway. When I get this working, I'm going to want to resume > only the storage devices, and haven't added code for that yet. > > Regards, > > Nigel -- Benjamin Herrenschmidt