All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: Stephen Crane <steve.crane@rococosoft.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Daryl Van Vorst <daryl@wideray.com>,
	"'BlueZ Mailing List'" <bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: RE: [Bluez-devel] Alignment issue
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:25:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1092306354.28711.88.camel@pegasus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1092305447.24961.1169.camel@baroque.rococosoft.com>

Hi Steve,

> > I am not an expert when it comes to specific compiler stuff and I can't
> > make the best decision with my limited information. What I realized is
> > that we need our own unaligned access implementation, because we can't
> > rely on the asm/unaligned.h. So I started to put our own in bluetooth.h
> > for general access. If this was wrong, please correct me.
> 
> I don't think this is wrong, in the absence of a system-supplied one.
> This is the basic problem if you ask me: <asm/unaligned.h> _should_ be a
> user-space header file (provided by glibc or something) because
> unaligned access _is_ something that people who write network programs
> need.

I must agree, but it seems that nobody provides a generic include for
unaligned access. So we don't have a choise at the moment :(

Regards

Marcel




-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-12 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-10 18:38 [Bluez-devel] Alignment issue Daryl Van Vorst
2004-08-10 23:12 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-08-11  9:20   ` Stephen Crane
2004-08-11 11:08     ` David Woodhouse
2004-08-11 19:33       ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-08-11  7:13 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-08-11 16:44   ` Daryl Van Vorst
2004-08-11 19:31     ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-08-12  8:34       ` David Woodhouse
2004-08-12  9:27         ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-08-12 10:01           ` David Woodhouse
2004-08-12 10:22             ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-08-12 10:35               ` David Woodhouse
2004-08-12 11:00                 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-08-12 11:33                   ` David Woodhouse
2004-08-12 11:49                     ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-08-12 12:02                       ` David Woodhouse
2004-08-12 12:29                         ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-08-12 13:36                         ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-08-13  8:07                           ` David Woodhouse
2004-08-13  9:05                             ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-08-13  9:14                               ` David Woodhouse
2004-08-13 11:52                               ` David Woodhouse
2004-08-13 12:40                                 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-08-12 12:53               ` David Woodhouse
2004-08-13  9:58                 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-08-13 10:56                   ` David Woodhouse
2004-08-12 10:10           ` Stephen Crane
2004-08-12 10:25             ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2005-01-20 14:30   ` David Woodhouse
2005-01-20 14:45     ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-01-20 14:59       ` David Woodhouse
2005-01-20 18:14         ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-01-21  8:26           ` David Woodhouse
2005-01-23  8:12             ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-01-23 11:39         ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-01-23 12:29           ` David Woodhouse
2005-01-23 14:40             ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-01-23 15:11               ` David Woodhouse
2005-01-23 15:22                 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-01-23 23:16                   ` David Woodhouse
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-16  9:48 john smith
2004-08-16 10:15 ` Marcel Holtmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1092306354.28711.88.camel@pegasus \
    --to=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=daryl@wideray.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=steve.crane@rococosoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.