From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266682AbUHONBw (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Aug 2004 09:01:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266683AbUHONBv (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Aug 2004 09:01:51 -0400 Received: from the-village.bc.nu ([81.2.110.252]:15838 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266682AbUHONBo (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Aug 2004 09:01:44 -0400 Subject: Re: external drive size differences From: Alan Cox To: Nigel Kukard Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20040815093759.GK31901@lbsd.net> References: <20040815093759.GK31901@lbsd.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1092571159.17605.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 12:59:20 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sul, 2004-08-15 at 10:37, Nigel Kukard wrote: > Something very very interesting... below is an external drive enclosure > supporting both USB2 and Firwire, fitted with a 200Gb IDE Hdd. > > When plugged into the firewire bus, i get 137Gb size, when plugged into > the usb bus, i get 200Gb size. > > Could this be a bug in the kernel? or external hardware? Your firewire adapter doesn't support large drives I would suspect. 137Gb is the exact limit of a non LBA48 aware adapter.