From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262071AbUHOQ4i (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Aug 2004 12:56:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265932AbUHOQ4g (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Aug 2004 12:56:36 -0400 Received: from smtp08.web.de ([217.72.192.226]:65471 "EHLO smtp08.web.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262071AbUHOQ4f (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Aug 2004 12:56:35 -0400 Subject: Re: [BKPATCH] ACPI for 2.6 From: Marcus Hartig To: Len Brown Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1092509038.7765.271.camel@dhcppc4> References: <566B962EB122634D86E6EE29E83DD808182C3286@hdsmsx403.hd.intel.com> <1092509038.7765.271.camel@dhcppc4> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 18:58:11 +0200 Message-Id: <1092589091.3806.10.camel@redtuxi> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 1.5.92.2 (1.5.92.2-2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Len Brown wrote: > Hmm, this config builds for me with gcc 3.3, > and neither dsfield.c nor acnamesp.h have changed in months. > > is it possible your source tree has been corrupted? Yes, my kernel source tree was corrupted... Do not know why. Now, with 2.6.8.1 and the ACPI patch no problems with my nForce2 board. Thanks, Marcus -- www.marcush.de