All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@free.fr>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
	Bernd Eckenfels <ecki-news2004-05@lina.inka.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux SATA RAID FAQ
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 21:51:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1092603106.18410.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1092603242.7421.6.camel@nomade>

On Sul, 2004-08-15 at 21:54, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Isn't sufficient to have it do ordered writes ? If you power your
> machine off, you'll have things half-written anyway, the only thing
> important with journaled filesystems (and raid5 arrays) is to have
> writes staying between barriers.

True to a point but 2Gb of data going walkies will offend even if the
file system is gloriously intact


  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-15 21:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-12  6:33 Linux SATA RAID FAQ Jeff Garzik
2004-08-12  7:18 ` Michael Knigge
2004-08-12 11:17   ` Paul Ionescu
2004-08-12 11:17     ` Paul Ionescu
2004-08-12 11:34 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-08-12 13:38   ` Bernd Eckenfels
2004-08-12 12:56     ` Alan Cox
2004-08-12 17:23       ` Jeff Garzik
2004-08-12 17:30         ` Jeff Garzik
2004-08-14 21:49           ` Alan Cox
2004-08-14 22:56             ` Jeff Garzik
2004-08-15 20:54             ` Xavier Bestel
2004-08-15 20:51               ` Alan Cox [this message]
2004-08-15 22:02                 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2004-08-15 21:42               ` Jakob Oestergaard
2004-08-16 22:06       ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-16 21:58         ` Alan Cox
2004-08-16 22:10         ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-12 14:01     ` Alistair John Strachan
2004-08-14  0:31   ` J. Ryan Earl
2004-08-14  3:17     ` Mark Lord
2004-08-14  6:37       ` age huisman
2004-08-14 11:03         ` Mark Lord
2004-08-14 15:21     ` Alan Cox
2004-08-14 22:28       ` J. Ryan Earl
2004-08-12 18:09 ` Martin Schlemmer
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-12 13:46 Dieter Stueken

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1092603106.18410.0.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=ecki-news2004-05@lina.inka.de \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xavier.bestel@free.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.