From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268072AbUHQBcl (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:32:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268073AbUHQBck (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:32:40 -0400 Received: from the-village.bc.nu ([81.2.110.252]:15590 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268072AbUHQBcb (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:32:31 -0400 Subject: Re: eth*: transmit timed out since .27 From: Alan Cox To: Oliver Feiler Cc: Len Brown , Marcelo Tosatti , Marcelo Tosatti , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <41213D66.1010909@gmx.net> References: <566B962EB122634D86E6EE29E83DD808182C3236@hdsmsx403.hd.intel.com> <1092678734.23057.18.camel@dhcppc4> <41210098.4080904@gmx.net> <41210649.4090008@gmx.net> <1092685821.23066.39.camel@dhcppc4> <41213D66.1010909@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1092702594.21344.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 01:29:56 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Looking over the docs the whole ACPI and IOAPIC mode for these boards seems very different and quite "magic" compared to the PCI mode which is merely "odd" in a few places. APIC routing bits are stuffed into strange chipset specific places which implies the quirks probably shouldn't be applied in acpi mode.