From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Kai OM" Subject: Re: Sym53c8xx_2 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 06:24:32 -0400 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1092738272.28646.202482540@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1092366037.28144.202254467@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1092432298.18813.202307545@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1092624889.15338.202386294@webmail.messagingengine.com> <41209D02.6010202@jound.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from frontend1.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.30]:24532 "EHLO frontend1.messagingengine.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264750AbUHQKYc (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Aug 2004 06:24:32 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41209D02.6010202@jound.net> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Lance Dryden , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 07:39:46 -0400, "Lance Dryden" said: > I can replicate the same problem with a Tekram DC390U3W, which is also > based on the LSI53C1010. I am guessing it's a specific problem with the > 53c1010, as I have since replaced it with a 53c895-based card (Tekram > DC390U2W) and it functions normally in the same system. > > For me, the failure symptom starts with domain validation of the first > device on the bus (Quantum Atlas V 18). The last lines indicate that > domain validation is beginning for the device. After a delay, the SCSI > layer reports an attempted device reset. Once that finishes, another > delay and then the SCSI layer reports an attempted bus reset. I will > need to re-attach a c1010 to the host in order to provide a precise log. The device I have attached to my LSIU160 is a Quantum Atlas 10K II. Model ATLAS10K2-TY734J. I wonder if it's an issue with 53c1010 variants in general, or maybe only when connected to certain devices? Can you test a different drive on the 53c1010 controller?