From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S267285AbUHSTHG@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S267285AbUHSTHG (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Thu, 19 Aug 2004 15:07:06 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267293AbUHSTFH
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 19 Aug 2004 15:05:07 -0400
Received: from the-village.bc.nu ([81.2.110.252]:8837 "EHLO
	localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S267283AbUHSTDk (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 19 Aug 2004 15:03:40 -0400
Subject: Re: kernbench on 512p
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: davidm@hpl.hp.com
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <16676.55284.896783.567359@napali.hpl.hp.com>
References: <200408191216.33667.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>
	 <16676.54657.220755.148837@napali.hpl.hp.com>
	 <200408191237.16959.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>
	 <16676.55284.896783.567359@napali.hpl.hp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <1092938120.28370.15.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) 
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 18:55:22 +0100
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Iau, 2004-08-19 at 17:40, David Mosberger wrote:
> Why not file a bug-report to Red Hat instead?  guile v1.6 and the
> guile-SLIB are quite old and rather standard.

On debian maybe.

The enterprise demand for guile-slib is suprisingly low ;)