From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Walters Subject: Re: libipq, kernel panics/oopses, and other undesirable traits Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 12:16:04 -0700 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <1093288564.10016.2.camel@marx.mindlink.net> References: <1092692707.22731.1687.camel@marx.mindlink.net> <41213777.9050701@trash.net> <1092703243.22731.1778.camel@marx.mindlink.net> <4121E082.6050602@trash.net> <1092775215.22731.1958.camel@marx.mindlink.net> <412A407A.8090009@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: Patrick McHardy In-Reply-To: <412A407A.8090009@trash.net> Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 12:07, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Hi Matt, > > Matt Walters wrote: > > >Thanks Patrick- > > > > A quick test shows that unaltered packets being passed back from > >userspace no longer cause kernel panics (yay) but also that they are not > >being responded to (boo). I'll have a look deeper into it later on. > > > > > any news on this ? I apologize, work didn't allow me to dig into this last week (pesky deadlines). This week isn't nearly as insane, so I'll have a look at it and get back to the list. -Matt