From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Matusik Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:26:08 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Some questions about hfsc Message-Id: <1093529563.3314.78.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Hello W li=B6cie z wto, 24-08-2004, godz. 00:33, Joshua Snyder pisze:=20 > I have been looking at the hfsc for some time as a replacement or at a > class that can be used like htb. But I seem to have run into a problem. > With htb classes it is easy to make three or more levels of priority for a > connection. All you need to do is to make classes and give them different > prio levels. But it seems like you can only define a real-time bandwidth > and a link sharing bandwidth. This seems like only 2 levels of priority. > Did I miss something? >=20 > josh If you want hierarchic structure you can try putting sub-qdiscs in classes you want to have lower priority. The 'rt' service curves in that qdiscs' classes would dequeue not to root class but to classes they are attached to. I wonder what are the disadventages of such solution. --=20 Krzysztof Matusik _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/