From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Scott Wood <scott@timesys.com>,
manas.saksena@timesys.com,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P9
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:54:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1093625672.837.25.camel@krustophenia.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1093556379.5678.109.camel@krustophenia.net>
On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 17:39, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 02:14, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > http://redhat.com/~mingo/voluntary-preempt/voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P9
> >
>
> Hmm, it seems that those strange ~1ms latencies are back. This was
> triggered by mounting an NTFS volume:
>
> http://krustophenia.net/testresults.php?dataset=2.6.8.1-P9#/var/www/2.6.8.1-P9/trace5.txt
>
I think vger was messed up yesterday, as this did not get through the
first time I sent it, and I did not get any messages from the list for
4-5 hours last night.
I am seeing large latencies (600-2000 usec) latencies in
dcache_readdir. This started when the machine became a Samba server and
the dcache presumably got large. Traces are at the above url (8 and 9 I
believe). I think this patch fixes it.
--- fs/libfs.c~ 2004-08-14 06:54:47.000000000 -0400
+++ fs/libfs.c 2004-08-27 00:44:17.000000000 -0400
@@ -140,6 +140,7 @@
}
for (p=q->next; p != &dentry->d_subdirs; p=p->next) {
struct dentry *next;
+ voluntary_resched_lock(&dcache_lock);
next = list_entry(p, struct dentry, d_child);
if (d_unhashed(next) || !next->d_inode)
continue;
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-27 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 93+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-23 22:18 [patch] PPC/PPC64 port of voluntary preempt patch Scott Wood
2004-08-24 6:14 ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P9 Ingo Molnar
2004-08-24 17:43 ` K.R. Foley
2004-08-24 20:32 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-24 20:53 ` Scott Wood
2004-08-24 19:20 ` K.R. Foley
2004-08-24 22:47 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-25 2:00 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-25 3:17 ` K.R. Foley
2004-08-25 3:22 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-25 14:34 ` K.R. Foley
2004-08-25 16:00 ` K.R. Foley
2004-08-25 3:26 ` K.R. Foley
2004-08-25 9:58 ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P9 : oprofile latency at 3.3ms P.O. Gaillard
2004-08-26 21:39 ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P9 Lee Revell
2004-08-27 16:54 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2004-08-28 7:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-28 15:10 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-28 12:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-30 9:27 ` voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P9 : big latency when logging on console P.O. Gaillard
2004-08-30 9:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-30 12:25 ` P.O. Gaillard
2004-08-30 9:48 ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P9 : a few submillisecond latencies P.O. Gaillard
2004-08-28 12:03 ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q0 Ingo Molnar
2004-08-28 16:18 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-08-28 16:50 ` K.R. Foley
2004-08-28 17:52 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-28 19:44 ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q2 Ingo Molnar
2004-08-28 20:01 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-28 20:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-28 20:08 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-28 20:10 ` Daniel Schmitt
2004-08-28 20:31 ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q3 Ingo Molnar
2004-08-28 21:10 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-28 21:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-28 21:16 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-28 23:51 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-29 2:35 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-29 5:43 ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q4 Ingo Molnar
2004-08-29 6:57 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-29 18:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-29 19:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-30 0:47 ` K.R. Foley
2004-08-30 3:42 ` K.R. Foley
2004-08-30 13:06 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-30 17:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-31 16:39 ` K.R. Foley
2004-08-30 9:06 ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q5 Ingo Molnar
2004-08-30 14:25 ` Thomas Charbonnel
2004-08-30 18:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-31 19:23 ` Thomas Charbonnel
2004-08-31 19:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-31 19:45 ` Thomas Charbonnel
2004-08-31 6:40 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-31 6:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-31 23:03 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-01 15:52 ` Martin Josefsson
2004-09-01 21:15 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-01 21:30 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-31 7:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-31 19:21 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-31 19:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-31 19:47 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-31 19:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-31 20:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-31 20:10 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-31 20:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-31 20:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-31 20:34 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-31 20:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-31 20:41 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-31 17:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2004-09-01 1:43 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-01 2:30 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-01 7:27 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-01 8:29 ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q6 Ingo Molnar
2004-09-01 13:51 ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q7 Ingo Molnar
2004-09-01 17:09 ` Thomas Charbonnel
2004-09-01 19:03 ` K.R. Foley
2004-09-01 20:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2004-09-01 20:16 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-01 20:53 ` K.R. Foley
[not found] ` <41367E5D.3040605@cybsft.com>
2004-09-02 5:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-02 5:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-30 12:52 ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q3 Ingo Molnar
2004-08-29 7:40 ` Matt Heler
2004-08-24 19:51 ` [patch] PPC/PPC64 port of voluntary preempt patch Scott Wood
2004-08-26 3:17 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-26 16:38 ` Scott Wood
2004-08-27 1:18 ` Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
2004-08-28 12:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-28 13:01 ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q1 Ingo Molnar
2004-08-30 1:06 ` Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1093625672.837.25.camel@krustophenia.net \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manas.saksena@timesys.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=scott@timesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.