From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sf.net>
Cc: linux-kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
clemtaylor@comcast.net, qg@biodome.org, rogers@isi.edu
Subject: Re: reverse engineering pwcx
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 12:25:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1093710358.8611.22.camel@krustophenia.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1093709838.434.6797.camel@cube>
On Sat, 2004-08-28 at 12:17, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> > The LavaRnd guys examined the pixels on the actual
> > CCD chip. It's 160x120. The 'decompression' is
> > just interpolation.
>
> Don't put much faith in the 160x120 number. Suppose
> that the chip is in a Bayer pattern, with 160x120
> of those. Well, how many pixels is that? Who knows.
> You'd sort of have 160x120, but with double the
> green data. Since green carries most of the luminance
> information, producing a larger image is reasonable.
Right, as someone else pointed out, this is wrong.
How do you account for the Slashdot poster's assertion that it's
physically impossible to cram 640 x 480 worth of data down a USB 1.1
pipe?
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-28 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-28 16:17 reverse engineering pwcx Albert Cahalan
2004-08-28 16:25 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2004-08-28 16:56 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-28 17:11 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-28 18:05 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-08-28 17:53 ` Joel Jaeggli
2004-08-28 18:04 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-28 18:08 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-29 21:04 ` Helge Hafting
2004-08-30 7:42 ` Paul Jakma
2004-08-30 12:52 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-30 20:23 ` dulle
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-28 0:52 QuantumG
[not found] ` <20040828012055.GL24018@isi.edu>
[not found] ` <20040828014931.GM24018@isi.edu>
2004-08-28 3:14 ` QuantumG
2004-08-28 3:35 ` Craig Milo Rogers
2004-08-28 3:49 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-28 12:23 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-08-28 19:20 ` Chris Meadors
2004-08-28 3:57 ` QuantumG
2004-08-28 12:07 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-08-28 6:47 ` Clem Taylor
2004-08-28 12:23 ` Wouter Van Hemel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1093710358.8611.22.camel@krustophenia.net \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=albert@users.sf.net \
--cc=clemtaylor@comcast.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qg@biodome.org \
--cc=rogers@isi.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.