From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268212AbUH2RRl (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:17:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268227AbUH2RRk (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:17:40 -0400 Received: from stat16.steeleye.com ([209.192.50.48]:43400 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268216AbUH2RRJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:17:09 -0400 Subject: Re: SMP Panic caused by [PATCH] sched: consolidate sched domains From: James Bottomley To: Jesse Barnes Cc: Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Matthew Dobson , Nick Piggin , Linux Kernel In-Reply-To: <200408291007.50553.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> References: <1093786747.1708.8.camel@mulgrave> <200408290948.06473.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> <1093798704.10973.15.camel@mulgrave> <200408291007.50553.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-9) Date: 29 Aug 2004 13:16:47 -0400 Message-Id: <1093799808.10990.22.camel@mulgrave> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 13:07, Jesse Barnes wrote: > I've up and downed a few CPUs on an Altix, and it seems to work ok, but that's > a pretty basic test. How about this? Well, like I told Bill. It's not a priori correct because now you're altering runtime behaviour. It may, in fact, work because if the runtime users have an additional restriction to online cpus, but that's not a given ... have you audited the code for this? James