From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268043AbUHaMDb (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Aug 2004 08:03:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268045AbUHaMDb (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Aug 2004 08:03:31 -0400 Received: from the-village.bc.nu ([81.2.110.252]:3719 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268043AbUHaMD3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Aug 2004 08:03:29 -0400 Subject: Re: microcode_ctl vs udev From: Alan Cox To: "J.A. Magallon" Cc: Lista Linux-Kernel In-Reply-To: <1093906213l.24821l.1l@werewolf.able.es> References: <1093906213l.24821l.1l@werewolf.able.es> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1093950085.32684.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 12:01:25 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Llu, 2004-08-30 at 23:50, J.A. Magallon wrote: > It looks like udev creates /dev/microcode, but microcode_ctl looks for > /dev/cpu/microcode. > > Which is the right location ? /dev/cpu/microcode according to the LANANA registration table