From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266508AbUIANVM (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Sep 2004 09:21:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266507AbUIANVL (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Sep 2004 09:21:11 -0400 Received: from the-village.bc.nu ([81.2.110.252]:11659 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266508AbUIANU2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Sep 2004 09:20:28 -0400 Subject: Re: MMC block major dev From: Alan Cox To: Pierre Ossman Cc: Russell King , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <4134CDF0.7070600@drzeus.cx> References: <4134CDF0.7070600@drzeus.cx> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1094041098.2476.58.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 13:18:19 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Maw, 2004-08-31 at 20:13, Pierre Ossman wrote: > Some debug statements revealed that the driver ended up on major number > 254. I'm not familiar with how kernel memory is initialized but using an > uninitialized variable should result in random numbers. It seems to get > 254 each time though. Can I count on this? (i.e. can I safely create > device node files with this major). No.