From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S266319AbUIANly@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S266319AbUIANly (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Wed, 1 Sep 2004 09:41:54 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266643AbUIANkC
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 1 Sep 2004 09:40:02 -0400
Received: from the-village.bc.nu ([81.2.110.252]:16523 "EHLO
	localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S266539AbUIANhs (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 1 Sep 2004 09:37:48 -0400
Subject: Re: net drivers depending on OBSOLETE
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, akpm@digeo.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040831181509.GI3466@fs.tum.de>
References: <20040831181509.GI3466@fs.tum.de>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <1094041993.2474.66.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) 
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 13:33:13 +0100
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Maw, 2004-08-31 at 19:15, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> More than one year ago, Alan Cox answered to the same question in two 
> emails:

I am not aware of any further 2.5/2.6 progress on this hardware. I
suspect that answers the important question.