From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268142AbUIGQtK (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2004 12:49:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268260AbUIGQrl (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2004 12:47:41 -0400 Received: from the-village.bc.nu ([81.2.110.252]:19109 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268116AbUIGOiK (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2004 10:38:10 -0400 Subject: Re: Possible network issue in 2.6.8.1 From: Alan Cox To: Joris Neujens Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1094564155.9152.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 14:35:56 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Maw, 2004-09-07 at 14:55, Joris Neujens wrote: > We have ruled out the following: > Network source is slow (we were testing with the same FTP server all the > time, from which we normally download at 10MB/sec) > We tested with 3 different systems and network cards, and they all have > the same problem, and only with kernel 2.6.8 > > any thoughts? See the list archive, or the lwn article on broken routers mangling TCP window size negotiation. The lwn article has a nice discussion as well as workarounds if you need them.