From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268379AbUIGScj (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2004 14:32:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268356AbUIGSbz (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2004 14:31:55 -0400 Received: from the-village.bc.nu ([81.2.110.252]:37797 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268379AbUIGS2s (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2004 14:28:48 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove wake_up_all_sync From: Alan Cox To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: akpm@osdl.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20040907180538.GA12434@lst.de> References: <20040907151154.GB9577@lst.de> <1094576397.9607.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20040907180538.GA12434@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1094577989.9607.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 18:26:32 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Maw, 2004-09-07 at 19:05, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > The sync wakeups are an absolutely special case, we're only using them > in the pipe code on __wake_up_parent. If you think it's a logical part > of the API were would you want to use it for? Fair comment on grepping and more digging - objection dropped