From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Richard A Nelson <cowboy@debian.org>
Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.9-rc1-mm4 kjournald oops (repeatable)
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 19:16:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1094685396.1362.245.camel@krustophenia.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0409081604060.6248@hygvzn-guhyr.pnirva.bet>
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 19:07, Richard A Nelson wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Richard A Nelson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 10:04, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 6b6b6b93
> > > > > ...
> > > > > EIP: 0060:[__journal_clean_checkpoint_list+199/240] Not tainted VLI
> > > >
> > > > This might have been caused by a fishy latency-reduction patch. I today
> > > > dropped that patch so could you please test next -mm and let me know?
> > >
> > > That, or preempt. If the next -mm still breaks, time to hunt for the
> > > preempt problem, I guess.
> >
> > Ok, if it still fails (I'll have to wait until this afternoon for the
> > true test - dpkg breaks it everytime), I'll check out preempt.
>
> Well, it looks like backing out the patch was sufficient, I've made it
> through the torture that is a dpkg install (70+meg).
>
> So we needn't (at this time) look to preempt.
Hmm, I have been running this patch for weeks as part of the voluntary
preemption patches, and put it through every torture test I can think
of, with nary an Oops. None of the other VP testers have reported
problems either. Maybe this is some interaction between that patch and
something else in -mm.
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-08 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-08 0:16 2.6.9-rc1-mm4 kjournald oops (repeatable) Richard A Nelson
2004-09-08 9:04 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-08 9:23 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2004-09-08 17:12 ` Richard A Nelson
2004-09-08 23:07 ` Richard A Nelson
2004-09-08 23:16 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2004-09-08 23:51 ` Richard A Nelson
2004-09-09 21:56 ` Bongani Hlope
2004-09-09 20:20 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2004-09-09 20:27 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-09 22:39 ` Bongani Hlope
2004-09-08 17:11 ` Richard A Nelson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1094685396.1362.245.camel@krustophenia.net \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=cowboy@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.