From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S267438AbUIOVkA@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S267438AbUIOVkA (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Wed, 15 Sep 2004 17:40:00 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267543AbUIOViE
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 15 Sep 2004 17:38:04 -0400
Received: from soundwarez.org ([217.160.171.123]:30878 "EHLO soundwarez.org")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267438AbUIOVeA (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 15 Sep 2004 17:34:00 -0400
Subject: Re: [patch] kernel sysfs events layer
From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
To: Robert Love <rml@novell.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <1095283614.23385.119.camel@betsy.boston.ximian.com>
References: <20040906020601.GA3199@vrfy.org>
	 <20040910235409.GA32424@kroah.com> <1094875775.10625.5.camel@lucy>
	 <20040911165300.GA17028@kroah.com> <20040913144553.GA10620@vrfy.org>
	 <20040915000753.GA24125@kroah.com> <1095211167.20763.2.camel@localhost>
	 <20040915034455.GB30747@kroah.com> <20040915194018.GC24131@kroah.com>
	 <1095279043.23385.102.camel@betsy.boston.ximian.com>
	 <20040915212110.GA25840@kroah.com>
	 <1095283614.23385.119.camel@betsy.boston.ximian.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 23:34:02 +0200
Message-Id: <1095284043.3508.7.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 1.5.94.1 (1.5.94.1-1) 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 17:26 -0400, Robert Love wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 14:21 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> 
> > Doh!  You're right.  Here's Kay's patch ported to the new interface, and
> > adding a umount event type.  I've applied it to my trees.
> 
> I am actually thinking that Kay's approach is less than ideal, since it
> does not catch all mounts and unmounts.

I was only looking from the sysfs side and want the event for a block
device. A generic mount notification was not on the plan that time and
will also not fit in the current kobject picture. We may name it "claim"
and "release" if you like that more.

Kay