From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
acpi-devel <acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ACPI] Re: [PATCH/RFC] exposing ACPI objects in sysfs
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:13:55 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1095794035.24751.54.camel@tdi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040921190606.GE18938@wotan.suse.de>
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 21:06 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 07:26:25PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > +struct special_cmd {
> > > + u32 magic;
> > > + unsigned int cmd;
> > > + char *args;
> > > +};
> >
> > Talk to Andi Kleen; passing such structures using read/write is evil,
> > because (unlike ioctl) there's no place to put 32/64bit
> > translation. Imagine i386 application running on x86-64 system.
>
> Yes, Pavel is right. Please don't pass pointers by read/write
> because it cannot be 32bit emulated.
All pointers are actually interpreted as offsets into the buffer for
this interface. They are not actually pointers. I believe the 32bit
emulation problem is limited to an ILP32 application generating data
structures appropriate for an LP64 kernel. While difficult, it can be
done.
Alex
--
Alex Williamson HP Linux & Open Source Lab
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-21 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-20 21:41 [PATCH/RFC] exposing ACPI objects in sysfs Alex Williamson
2004-09-21 12:24 ` Pavel Machek
2004-09-21 14:18 ` Alex Williamson
2004-09-21 16:48 ` Alex Williamson
2004-09-21 17:26 ` Pavel Machek
2004-09-21 18:00 ` Alex Williamson
2004-09-21 19:31 ` Pavel Machek
2004-09-21 19:06 ` [ACPI] " Andi Kleen
2004-09-21 19:13 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2004-09-21 19:18 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-21 19:45 ` Alex Williamson
2004-09-21 19:58 ` Pavel Machek
2004-09-21 20:40 ` Alex Williamson
2004-09-21 21:02 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <20040921210218.GJ30425-I/5MKhXcvmPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
2004-10-15 22:39 ` Alex Williamson
2004-10-15 22:39 ` [ACPI] " Alex Williamson
2004-10-26 20:55 ` [RFC] dev_acpi: support for userspace access to acpi Alex Williamson
2004-10-26 20:55 ` Alex Williamson
2004-09-21 19:21 ` [ACPI] Re: [PATCH/RFC] exposing ACPI objects in sysfs Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1095794035.24751.54.camel@tdi \
--to=alex.williamson@hp.com \
--cc=acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.