From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: Daryl Van Vorst <daryl@wideray.com>
Cc: "'BlueZ Mailing List'" <bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: RE: [Bluez-devel] Rfcomm Use Count
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:53:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1095861229.6223.32.camel@pegasus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1095851321.6223.15.camel@pegasus>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 645 bytes --]
Hi Daryl,
> the correct approach seems to be:
>
> sk->sk_zapped = 1;
> rfcomm_sock_kill(sk);
>
> The problem is that rfcomm_sock_kill() must be called on an unlocked
> socket and I think that we will deadlock on a SMP machine or get some
> NULL pointer dereferences.
after more and more thinking about that problem I am almost sure that it
is right to call rfcomm_sock_kill() in the state change function. Anyway
we must do this on an unlocked socket. Here is my proposal for the final
patch, but we need real testing on this so that I can be sure that there
are no side effects. Can anyone test it on SMP or HT systems?
Regards
Marcel
[-- Attachment #2: patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2199 bytes --]
===== include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h 1.18 vs edited =====
--- 1.18/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h 2004-07-04 17:27:14 +02:00
+++ edited/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h 2004-09-21 01:26:06 +02:00
@@ -133,6 +133,7 @@
int bt_sock_wait_state(struct sock *sk, int state, unsigned long timeo);
void bt_accept_enqueue(struct sock *parent, struct sock *sk);
+void bt_accept_unlink(struct sock *sk);
struct sock *bt_accept_dequeue(struct sock *parent, struct socket *newsock);
/* Skb helpers */
===== net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c 1.36 vs edited =====
--- 1.36/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c 2004-07-13 15:39:15 +02:00
+++ edited/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c 2004-09-21 01:26:17 +02:00
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(bt_accept_enqueue);
-static void bt_accept_unlink(struct sock *sk)
+void bt_accept_unlink(struct sock *sk)
{
BT_DBG("sk %p state %d", sk, sk->sk_state);
@@ -174,6 +174,7 @@
bt_sk(sk)->parent = NULL;
sock_put(sk);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(bt_accept_unlink);
struct sock *bt_accept_dequeue(struct sock *parent, struct socket *newsock)
{
===== net/bluetooth/l2cap.c 1.44 vs edited =====
--- 1.44/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c 2004-09-04 12:51:17 +02:00
+++ edited/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c 2004-09-21 01:23:41 +02:00
@@ -1005,9 +1005,10 @@
if (err)
sk->sk_err = err;
- if (parent)
+ if (parent) {
+ bt_accept_unlink(sk);
parent->sk_data_ready(parent, 0);
- else
+ } else
sk->sk_state_change(sk);
}
===== net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c 1.29 vs edited =====
--- 1.29/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c 2004-06-04 02:41:47 +02:00
+++ edited/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c 2004-09-22 13:26:26 +02:00
@@ -97,17 +97,26 @@
if (err)
sk->sk_err = err;
+
sk->sk_state = d->state;
parent = bt_sk(sk)->parent;
- if (!parent) {
+ if (parent) {
+ if (d->state == BT_CLOSED) {
+ sk->sk_zapped = 1;
+ bt_accept_unlink(sk);
+ }
+ parent->sk_data_ready(parent, 0);
+ } else {
if (d->state == BT_CONNECTED)
rfcomm_session_getaddr(d->session, &bt_sk(sk)->src, NULL);
sk->sk_state_change(sk);
- } else
- parent->sk_data_ready(parent, 0);
+ }
bh_unlock_sock(sk);
+
+ if (parent && sk->sk_zapped)
+ rfcomm_sock_kill(sk);
}
/* ---- Socket functions ---- */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-22 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-17 0:10 [Bluez-devel] Rfcomm Use Count Daryl Van Vorst
2004-09-17 8:58 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-09-20 17:58 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2004-09-20 18:32 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-09-20 18:52 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2004-09-20 19:48 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-09-20 20:52 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2004-09-20 18:37 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2004-09-20 19:50 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-09-20 20:11 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2004-09-20 20:34 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-09-20 21:03 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2004-09-20 21:28 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-09-20 22:38 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2004-09-20 23:33 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-09-21 20:14 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2004-09-21 20:32 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-09-21 20:39 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2004-09-21 21:26 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2004-09-21 22:07 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-09-21 22:26 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-09-21 22:44 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2004-09-22 11:08 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-09-22 13:53 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2004-09-22 17:57 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2004-09-22 18:12 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-09-22 19:05 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2004-09-22 19:33 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-09-22 19:52 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2004-09-22 19:57 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-09-22 20:05 ` Daryl Van Vorst
[not found] ` <1096471423.20392.444.camel@igno>
2004-10-02 9:26 ` Marcel Holtmann
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-13 19:06 [Bluez-devel] Rfcomm use count Daryl Van Vorst
2004-09-13 20:48 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2004-09-13 23:54 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2004-09-14 9:18 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-09-14 21:58 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2004-08-31 22:09 Daryl Van Vorst
2004-09-08 22:48 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2004-09-08 23:10 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2004-09-12 14:15 ` Marcel Holtmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1095861229.6223.32.camel@pegasus \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=daryl@wideray.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.