From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Torbj=F6rn?= Olander <tosse@wlug.westbo.se>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 19:38:30 +0000
Subject: Re: 2.6.8.1 and XFree86
Message-Id: <1095968310.777.0.camel@iota>
List-Id: <sparclinux.vger.kernel.org>
References: <1092597725.2550.7.camel@iota>
In-Reply-To: <1092597725.2550.7.camel@iota>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 17:17, Admar Schoonen wrote:
> > On my Ultra 5, linux kernel 2.6.7 runs fine but after that (2.6.8-rc1
> > and on, no change with 2.6.8.1) XFree86 gets this message:
>=20
> [snip, X server gest signal 11]
>=20
> > I'm running Debian Unstable.
> > Any way to solve this issue?
>=20
> I have exactly the same problem on my blade 100. I expected the problem
> to be with the 2nd framebuffer as my ultra 5 works fine and has only 1
> fb. I haven't found the time yet to open up the blade 100 and try X with
> 2.6.8 and only 1 framebuffer.
>=20
> Both my machines are running debian unstable. Only the blade 100 has a
> second framebuffer (Ati mach64, 8 MB, same as on board chip, but on a
> pci card). Ultra 5 has a slightly older Ati mach64 4 MB onboard.
>=20
> Do you have a second framebuffer in your ultra 5?
> And do you have a working X with 2.6.8 already?

No, I only have one frambuffer (the built in one).
No X has'nt worked since 2.6.7 (vanilla).

> Best regards
>=20
> Admar
--=20
Med v=E4nliga h=E4lsningar / Best regards
Torbj=F6rn Olander
tosse@wlug.westbo.se