From: Chris Worley <cworley@symbionsys.com>
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Re: SUSE 9.1 with ReiserFS: / won't fsck, but is otherwise fine
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 07:20:16 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1096032016.17001.4.camel@xserver.local.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200409241116.09066.vitaly@namesys.com>
On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 01:17, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
> On Friday 24 September 2004 07:20, Chris Worley wrote:
> > I have a similar problem to:
> >
> > On 2004-07-15 13:06:46 Vitaly Fertman Wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > >...
> > > >
> > > > Boot --> please use fsck manualy on /
> > >
> > > what version of reiserfsck are you using? please update
> > > reiserfsprogs to the latest one from our ftp site.
> >
> > I'm using 3.6.13... which version do you propose?
>
> the latest is 3.6.18 (ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfsprogs/)
> try it please.
Same result:
# ./fsck/reiserfsck /dev/system/lvol0
reiserfsck 3.6.18 (2003 www.namesys.com)
*************************************************************
** If you are using the latest reiserfsprogs and it fails **
**... **
*************************************************************
Will read-only check consistency of the filesystem on /dev/system/lvol0
Will put log info to 'stdout'
Do you want to run this program?[N/Yes] (note need to type Yes if you
do):Yes
Failed to open the device '/dev/system/lvol0': No such device or address
Aborted
Note that I am building reiserfs statically in the kernel (SuSE's
2.6.5-52-bigsmp).
Thanks,
Chris
>
> > > ...
> >
> > I'm getting the same error where the ReiserFS root partition won't fsck,
> > but seems otherwise fine:
> >
> > I "fixed" it by replacing /sbin/mkfs.reiserfs with a script that always
> > returns true... now the system boots fine ;)
> >
> > It's a Reiser fs atop an LVM block device of one partition. The problem
> > started when I switched from lilo to grub... that could be irrelevant.
> >
> > Once booted, Reiser still doesn't even recognize the root file system (I
> > saved the executable in fsck.reiserfs.bak):
> >
> > # /sbin/fsck.reiserfs.bak /dev/system/lvol0
> > reiserfsck 3.6.13 (2003 www.namesys.com)
> >
> > *************************************************************
> > ** If you are using the latest reiserfsprogs and it fails **
> > ** please email bug reports to reiserfs-list@namesys.com, **
> > ** providing as much information as possible -- your **
> > ** hardware, kernel, patches, settings, all reiserfsck **
> > ** messages (including version), the reiserfsck logfile, **
> > ** check the syslog file for any related information. **
> > ** If you would like advice on using this program, support **
> > ** is available for $25 at www.namesys.com/support.html. **
> > *************************************************************
> >
> > Will read-only check consistency of the filesystem on
> > /dev/system/lvol0 Will put log info to 'stdout'
> >
> > Do you want to run this program?[N/Yes] (note need to type Yes if
> > you do):Yes
> >
> > Failed to open the device '/dev/system/lvol0': No such device or
> > address
> >
> > Aborted
> >
> > Note: I'm running a fully patched 9.1. I've been able to use this
> > fsck.reiserfs to examine other LVM based file systems that were created
> > under previous LVM and ReiserFS versions. The volume is currently only
> > made up of /dev/hda3. Both the lvm block device and reiser format were
> > created under SuSE9.1 (before patching). LVM has no problems:
> >
> > # pvscan
> > PV /dev/hda3 VG system lvm2 [226.25 GB / 0 free]
> > PV /dev/hdd1 lvm2 [233.76 GB]
> > Total: 2 [460.01 GB] / in use: 1 [226.25 GB] / in no VG: 1
> > [233.76 GB] # vgdisplay
> > --- Volume group ---
> > VG Name system
> > System ID
> > Format lvm2
> > Metadata Areas 1
> > Metadata Sequence No 2
> > VG Access read/write
> > VG Status resizable
> > MAX LV 255
> > Cur LV 1
> > Open LV 1
> > Max PV 255
> > Cur PV 1
> > Act PV 1
> > VG Size 226.25 GB
> > PE Size 4.00 MB
> > Total PE 57921
> > Alloc PE / Size 57921 / 226.25 GB
> > Free PE / Size 0 / 0
> > VG UUID glCBN4-xLPB-eGJO-4YVO-p4Hj-ZRMW-LFvJfJ
> > # lvdisplay
> > --- Logical volume ---
> > LV Name /dev/system/lvol0
> > VG Name system
> > LV UUID j9z3cd-hY3R-4unM-UwZs-BXVZ-WMJN-iMIvXF
> > LV Write Access read/write
> > LV Status available
> > # open 2
> > LV Size 226.25 GB
> > Current LE 57921
> > Segments 1
> > Allocation next free (default)
> > Read ahead sectors 0
> > Block device 254:0
> > # pvdisplay
> > --- Physical volume ---
> > PV Name /dev/hda3
> > VG Name system
> > PV Size 226.25 GB / not usable 0
> > Allocatable yes (but full)
> > PE Size (KByte) 4096
> > Total PE 57921
> > Free PE 0
> > Allocated PE 57921
> > PV UUID wQnbCq-FQT9-76gh-HjFP-kBi3-7lE8-psDnAj
> >
> > --- NEW Physical volume ---
> > PV Name /dev/hdd1
> > VG Name
> > PV Size 233.76 GB
> > Allocatable NO
> > PE Size (KByte) 0
> > Total PE 0
> > Free PE 0
> > Allocated PE 0
> > PV UUID lZ0dSs-FR6O-i7fo-z5xZ-APMR-CcBq-Fmm425
> > # df
> > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> > /dev/mapper/system-lvol0
> > 237237168 141678036 95559132 60% /
> > tmpfs 517676 0 517676 0% /dev/shm
> > /dev/hda1 38856 18321 18529 50% /boot
> >
> > Other than fsck, there's no other hint that something is wrong with this
> > partition.
> >
> > If this partition were at the beginning of the disk (and not 8GB into
> > the disk) I'd think grub had destroyed something beyond the MBR... but
> > this is too far into the disk.
> >
> > Any idea what's wrong with this root partition and what I could do to
> > recover it?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-24 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-24 3:20 SUSE 9.1 with ReiserFS: / won't fsck, but is otherwise fine Chris Worley
2004-09-24 7:17 ` Vitaly Fertman
2004-09-24 13:20 ` Chris Worley [this message]
2004-09-24 13:30 ` Hendrik Visage
2004-09-24 13:56 ` Chris Worley
2004-09-24 14:32 ` Hendrik Visage
2004-09-24 14:58 ` Chris Worley
2004-09-27 14:44 ` Vitaly Fertman
2004-09-27 16:06 ` Chris Worley
2004-09-27 22:16 ` evilninja
2004-09-27 22:40 ` Chris Worley
2004-09-29 0:38 ` evilninja
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1096032016.17001.4.camel@xserver.local.net \
--to=cworley@symbionsys.com \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.