From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "lartc@manchotnetworks.net" Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 13:26:41 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] interesting expert problem - shaping over VPN Message-Id: <1096205201.6964.1.camel@drs0> List-Id: References: <200409171357.i8HDvISi001092@pog.tecnopolis.ca> In-Reply-To: <200409171357.i8HDvISi001092@pog.tecnopolis.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org whoops, oh yea -- ipsec and that whole eth0 thingy :-/ no wakeup on sundays. are you running your tunnel exclusively for voice, or are there other protocols as well ( i.e. contention). cheers c On Sun, 2004-09-26 at 11:36, Trevor Cordes wrote: > On 26 Sep, lartc@manchotnetworks.net wrote: > > hi trevor, > > > > perhaps others can chime in on their experiences and configs that have > > shown promise for voip. > > OK, I'll keep watching/posting. > > > i would think that you would want to egress on both interfaces to insure > > that the packets you want pass first. i thought that you had both > > already. > > I have egress on ipsec0 and ppp0 but not eth0. It's actually 3 > interfaces total, which is why I hate PPPoE... it's so over complicated. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/