From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 06 Oct 2004 22:03:06 +0100 (BST)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([IPv6:::ffff:66.187.233.31]:39331 "EHLO
	mx1.redhat.com") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id <S8225221AbUJFVDB>;
	Wed, 6 Oct 2004 22:03:01 +0100
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i96L2xq3025310;
	Wed, 6 Oct 2004 17:02:59 -0400
Received: from pobox.hsv.redhat.com (pobox.hsv.redhat.com [172.16.16.12])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i96L2xr30677;
	Wed, 6 Oct 2004 17:02:59 -0400
Received: from [172.16.16.120] (riff.hsv.redhat.com [172.16.16.120])
	by pobox.hsv.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i96L2w4f020689;
	Wed, 6 Oct 2004 17:02:58 -0400
Subject: Re: Asm hack for GCC 3.4 changes
From: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: MIPS Linux List <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
In-Reply-To: <20041006203924.GC11293@linux-mips.org>
References: <1097076486.3185.23.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <20041006203924.GC11293@linux-mips.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1097096577.3185.59.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) 
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 16:02:58 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-Path: <williams@redhat.com>
X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0)
X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
X-archive-position: 5961
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
X-original-sender: williams@redhat.com
Precedence: bulk
X-list: linux-mips

On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 15:39, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> > Hope it's useful.
> 
> I was actually waiting for somebody else to commit a similar but more
> complete patch into CVS.  His patch was a little more complete but your's
> is a bit more stylish ...

So, what you're saying is that the German judge scored me big on
artistic merit, but my technical score wasn't high enough for a gold
medal?

:)

Clark