From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 977E82BF06 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:49:41 +1000 (EST) From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Colin Leroy In-Reply-To: <20041020094651.5ceff814@pirandello> References: <20041018232004.0a9e0d5e@jack.colino.net> <1098143379.18687.44.camel@gaston> <20041019083432.01b947d3@pirandello> <1098168058.15029.45.camel@gaston> <20041020094651.5ceff814@pirandello> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1098258558.3223.10.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:49:19 +1000 Cc: linuxppc-dev Subject: Re: PMU questions List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 17:46, Colin Leroy wrote: > I can't find a logic in this stuff... Do you think there's a special > reason why Apple uses such a complicated method instead of > a) charging until voltage stays equals for a few minutes > b) draining until voltage goes under 13.5 volts (or 13, or whatever) > > In my uninformed opinion that would work better, wouldn't it? I don't know... Ben.