From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Lamont R. Peterson" Subject: Re: viewprinting: what format should views be stored in? Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 09:54:46 -0600 Message-ID: <1098806086.2610.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20040819074027.8429715D94@mail03.powweb.com> <41248D43.3040905@dgreaves.com> <4124D09A.1060208@comcast.net> <4124E408.3090405@dgreaves.com> <41259FBF.5040308@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-C365ZyO8SSdN4KGtPUqV" Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <41259FBF.5040308@namesys.com> List-Id: To: ReiserFS List --=-C365ZyO8SSdN4KGtPUqV Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 00:52, Hans Reiser wrote: > David Greaves wrote: >=20 > > > > David > > PS can I offer 'mask specification' (shortened to maskspec above)=20 > > instead of 'presentation mask' for the glossary. > > > > > Glossary? of? >=20 > Instead of mask specification, just say mask. >=20 > I think I like mask more than view.... I respectfully disagree. I like view better than mask. After all, the term mask is used in lots of places already. If you want to distinguish viewprinting from those things, I think "view" is the way to go. Also, I think view is more accurately descriptive of what it is that you are trying to accomplish here. It is also a more accurate term for us database people :-). --=20 Lamont R. Peterson Senior Instructor Guru Labs, L.C. http://www.GuruLabs.com/ --=-C365ZyO8SSdN4KGtPUqV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBfnNG+YBsl9wN1AkRAjbeAJ9SZFLrSx92Vj3H7pWcgXEbX/CAoQCeOfqx 48RGyrnoJsX4wDdqJo3S3mY= =XoEG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-C365ZyO8SSdN4KGtPUqV--