From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: Re: Linux ACPI processor driver patch: user-definable power state limit Date: 05 Nov 2004 19:33:13 -0500 Message-ID: <1099701193.13834.1739.camel@d845pe> References: <200410112335.19159.jos.delbar@ugent.be> <1099683907.13837.1353.camel@d845pe> <20041105225438.GA8262@dominikbrodowski.de> <1099696293.13834.1639.camel@d845pe> <20041105235403.GA21880@dominikbrodowski.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20041105235403.GA21880-X3ehHDuj6sIIGcDfoQAp7BvVK+yQ3ZXh@public.gmane.org> Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Dominik Brodowski Cc: Jos Delbar , ACPI Developers , Robert Moore , James P Ketrenos List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org I think it is okay for the ipw2100 to depend on CONFIG_ACPI, but I don't think it is okay for the ipw2100 driver to depend on the processor driver being loaded (and staying loaded) for this to work. thanks, -Len ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click