From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: Linux ACPI processor driver patch: user-definable power state limit Date: 05 Nov 2004 21:59:03 -0500 Message-ID: <1099709942.13831.2092.camel@d845pe> References: <200410112335.19159.jos.delbar@ugent.be> <1099683907.13837.1353.camel@d845pe> <200411060021.49794.jos.delbar@ugent.be> <1099702882.15333.1824.camel@d845pe> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1099702882.15333.1824.camel@d845pe> Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Jos Delbar Cc: ACPI Developers , Robert Moore , James P Ketrenos , Andi Kleen List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Andi's c2/c3 blacklist patch alters the promote/demote structures and the acpi_cstate_limit patch lives within those bounds. So we keep both for now and acpi_state_limit will never break the blacklist. Hopefully we'll figure out the problem with the two c2/c3 blacklisted systems and delete them and that workaround over time. thanks, -Len ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click