All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com>
Subject: Re: stmmac: Race in coalesce timer and NAPI
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 06:54:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <109edd5e-15d2-e89a-9331-a63798eb292b@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dd4b67f1-5ce7-22e2-8fe5-8925ec016386@synopsys.com>



On 09/21/2018 02:19 AM, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I'm getting a race in stmmac coalesce timer and the
> napi_schedule() interrupt and I'm asking for advice. Currently,
> we are scheduling NAPI in coalesce timer but this leads to
> stmmac_tx_clean() deadlock because this function tries to acquire
> queue lock.

This is strange. Which lock are you talking about ?

The napi_schedule() stuff should be enough to protect your use case.


> 
> I find that this is not expected because only one instance of
> NAPI should run at same time so I was wondering if it is possible
> that xmit() callback is causing the deadlock ?
> 
> BTW, this is solved by:
>     - Directly call stmmac_tx_clean() in timer function AND
>     - Use netif_tx_trylock() in stmmac_tx_clean(). Then, if queue
> is already locked we re-arm coalesce timer or reschedule NAPI.
> 
> This is easily reproducible in an ARM board with 8 core running
> at 100MHz each.
> 
> Thanks and Best Regards,
> Jose Miguel Abreu
> 

It looks to me stmmac_napi_poll() should not apply/consume any budget for TX completion.

The budget for a NAPI poll shared by RX and TX is really only for the RX side.

netpoll will specificall call the poll() with budget==0 to only drain TX

      reply	other threads:[~2018-09-21 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-21  9:19 stmmac: Race in coalesce timer and NAPI Jose Abreu
2018-09-21 13:54 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=109edd5e-15d2-e89a-9331-a63798eb292b@gmail.com \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com \
    --cc=Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.