All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Meta kernel team <kernel-team@meta.com>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/7] locking: opt-in tracking of sleeping lock holders
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 13:34:30 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <10b93dce66eb13a23fbab563df259092@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924155025.949998-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev>

Hello, Shakeel.

On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 08:50:18AM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> The answer is a count in task_struct. Only the locks that ask to be
> tracked are counted. The mechanism introduced here is planned to be used
> by solutions for shared lock isolation scenarios [1].
...
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/20260921192559.2619635-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev/

Let's resolve the discussion on the overall approach first.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-28 23:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-24 15:50 [PATCH RESEND 0/7] locking: opt-in tracking of sleeping lock holders Shakeel Butt
2026-09-24 15:50 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/7] locking: add " Shakeel Butt
2026-09-24 15:50 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/7] locking/rwsem: track holders of opted-in rw_semaphores Shakeel Butt
2026-09-24 15:50 ` [PATCH RESEND 3/7] locking/mutex: track holders of opted-in mutexes Shakeel Butt
2026-09-24 15:50 ` [PATCH RESEND 4/7] locking/percpu-rwsem: track holders of opted-in percpu_rw_semaphores Shakeel Butt
2026-09-24 15:50 ` [PATCH RESEND 5/7] locking/selftests: add KUnit tests for lock holder tracking Shakeel Butt
2026-09-24 15:50 ` [PATCH RESEND 6/7] Documentation/locking: document sleeping " Shakeel Butt
2026-09-24 15:50 ` [PATCH RESEND 7/7] kernfs, cgroup: track holders of the cgroupfs locks Shakeel Butt
2026-09-28 23:34 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2026-10-01 10:41   ` [PATCH RESEND 0/7] locking: opt-in tracking of sleeping lock holders Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-01 11:44     ` Shakeel Butt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=10b93dce66eb13a23fbab563df259092@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=boqun@kernel.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=christian@brauner.io \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.