From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>,
Marek Behun <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Cc: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] btrfs: simplify lookup_data_extent()
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 15:06:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10c9170d-41e0-2a20-ecee-e37e96d0fa61@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ebc77987-0212-1623-245d-8c79cba5fa80@gmx.com>
On 2022/5/11 06:48, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2022/5/11 03:43, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>> After returning if ret <= 0 we know that ret > 0. No need to check it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Just to mention for other guys in the btrfs list, this patch is for
U-boot btrfs implementation.
And I also checked btrfs-fuse project, which has a similar function,
lookup_file_extent(), it already does the check properly and even do
extra quick exit for (ret > 0 && path->slots[0] == 0) case.
So you may want to also check btrfs-fuse project to find some possible
optimization and cross-port to U-boot.
(So far btrfs-fuse has better test coverage using fsstress, and
cross-checked against kernel).
Thanks,
Qu
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
>> ---
>> fs/btrfs/inode.c | 15 ++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
>> index d00b515333..0173d30cd8 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
>> @@ -546,15 +546,12 @@ static int lookup_data_extent(struct btrfs_root
>> *root, struct btrfs_path *path,
>> /* Error or we're already at the file extent */
>> if (ret <= 0)
>> return ret;
>> - if (ret > 0) {
>> - /* Check previous file extent */
>> - ret = btrfs_previous_item(root, path, ino,
>> - BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY);
>> - if (ret < 0)
>> - return ret;
>> - if (ret > 0)
>> - goto check_next;
>> - }
>> + /* Check previous file extent */
>> + ret = btrfs_previous_item(root, path, ino, BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> + if (ret > 0)
>> + goto check_next;
>> /* Now the key.offset must be smaller than @file_offset */
>> btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(path->nodes[0], &key, path->slots[0]);
>> if (key.objectid != ino ||
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-11 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-10 19:43 [PATCH 1/1] btrfs: simplify lookup_data_extent() Heinrich Schuchardt
2022-05-10 22:48 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-11 7:06 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2022-05-11 2:40 ` Anand Jain
2022-06-07 16:46 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=10c9170d-41e0-2a20-ecee-e37e96d0fa61@gmx.com \
--to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marek.behun@nic.cz \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.