From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87851C05027 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 07:48:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A208124C; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 07:48:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 12A208124C X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mUMyO2a6h5dQ; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 07:48:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4C681099; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 07:48:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 5C4C681099 Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 067751BF27E for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 07:48:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F1406102E for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 07:48:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 4F1406102E X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DH-NC6Hy44CZ for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 07:48:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 951856103E Received: from mail.heine.tech (mail.heine.tech [195.201.24.99]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 951856103E for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 07:48:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPA id 939B61814B9; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 08:48:06 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20230219220217.6b34a65f@windsurf> Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 08:48:06 +0100 To: "Thomas Petazzoni" MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <10dac5-63f32580-3-1c9b7240@22476584> User-Agent: SOGoMail 5.8.0 X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: None X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heine.tech; s=dkim; t=1676879287; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=3ntR9wcKjtgb9o30H/SDLZCOX7UWCBFRwciDxW1xxkM=; b=rsSupaP1VpRnjwFcqRVVTTMh7nmKKSuvq172qWivd16hsm1H0Hp9hIFZDX97n3i2SPCJHM XMsTYwMJf5fkSAqW5zYjIKRd5JMT+uwibwRM3HH8yf6Tg0/rYrZTJ5UY8pzkf61YbmYLVg g6T3c+qwpmEt5jb42/3OuilD3FoxJy4= X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=heine.tech header.i=@heine.tech header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dkim header.b=rsSupaP1 Subject: Re: [Buildroot] =?utf-8?q?=5BPATCH=5D_packge/libabseil-cpp=3A_bump_t?= =?utf-8?q?o_version_20230125=2E0?= X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Michael Nosthoff via buildroot Reply-To: Michael Nosthoff Cc: Robert Rose , Michael Nosthoff via buildroot Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Hi, On Sunday, February 19, 2023 22:02 CET, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Hello Michael, > > On Sat, 18 Feb 2023 12:48:37 +0100 > Michael Nosthoff via buildroot wrote: > > > libabseil now depends on c++14 and gcc >= 7.3.1 [0][1] > > > > [0] https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/releases/tag/20230125.0 > > [1] https://github.com/google/oss-policies-info/blob/main/foundational-cxx-support-matrix.md > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Nosthoff > > --- > > > > Note: > > I'm not sure if the BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_7 dependency is sufficient. > > But I don't think we have a more version specific Flag available? > > We don't have more specific blind options than 7.x, 8.x, etc. to > describe a gcc dependency. > > > package/grpc/Config.in | 6 +++--- > > package/libabseil-cpp/Config.in | 6 +++--- > > package/libabseil-cpp/libabseil-cpp.hash | 2 +- > > package/libabseil-cpp/libabseil-cpp.mk | 6 +++--- > > 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > I'm afraid this is not sufficient. Indeed, you need to look at the > reverse dependencies of GRPC for example. > > So, package/falcosecurity-libs needs to be adjusted, then > package/sysdig as well, and also the BR2_PACKAGE_COLLECTD_GRPC option > from package/collectd. > good point. since grpc now also only has "officially support for gcc 7.3+" I would then first bump grpc with all it dependencies and then resubmit this patch. https://github.com/grpc/grpc/blob/master/src/cpp/README.md > Could you have a look into this, and submit an updated version? > > Thanks a lot! > > Thomas Regards, Michael _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot