From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Revell Subject: Re: The ALSA Situation Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 00:59:52 -0500 Message-ID: <1100066393.3137.4.camel@krustophenia.net> References: <200411100150.iAA1okCE029069@localhost.localdomain> <001e01c4c6ce$77672eb0$0a00000a@eugenia> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <001e01c4c6ce$77672eb0$0a00000a@eugenia> Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Eugenia Loli-Queru Cc: Paul Davis , alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, torvalds@osdl.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 18:38 -0800, Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote: > 2. This: http://www.osnews.com/img/6443/audio.png Check the clean and > logical OSS options and then check the endless alsa ones (my monitor was not > wide enough to fit them all). Why things like that are not cleaned up? (it's > not gnome's volume control fault btw, I asked the developer, he said it's > Alsa's) Bullshit. If ALSA provides too many controls then GNOME volume control should abstract them a bit. For example, use separate tabs for playback and capture, like alsamixer, or leave some elements out, instead of blithely cramming every mixer element into one tab without regard to whether it will fit on screen or whether that mixer control SHOULD be user visible. Sorry, this is not ALSA's job. Lee ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click