From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eduardo =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez?= Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 23:03:33 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Packet loss with htb+sfq+l7filter Message-Id: <1100559813.5830.3.camel@laserite> List-Id: References: <1100530341.2796.19.camel@laserite> In-Reply-To: <1100530341.2796.19.camel@laserite> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Hi Eicke, But setting up a bridge there'll be another machine routing, so I'll need ip_forward either way, and I won't avoid the problem if it's really ip_forward, I will only move it to another machine. Regards, Eduardo El lun, 15-11-2004 a las 23:37 +0100, Eicke Friedrich escribi=F3: > Hi, > Eduardo Fern=E1ndez wrote: > > (http://kem.p.lodz.pl/~peter/qnet/). When I activate ip_forward I get > > >20% packet loss and a lot of duplicates. Any ideas? I attach my shaping > well we've done something similar but instead of using a route we used=20 > a bridge (acting as traffic shaper and firewall). So you don't need=20 > ip_forward maybe this is worth a try in your setup? In general a box=20 > like your should easily handle much more traffic that 4+4MBit/s. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/