From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Woodhouse To: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" In-Reply-To: References: <1100613327.8191.6954.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <1100615381.8191.6957.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1100617420.8191.6959.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:03:41 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: MTD List Subject: Re: your mail List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 14:54 +0000, Artem B. Bityuckiy wrote: > Yes. But imagine some file which is constant and is never changed. We > create checkpoint for it and this checkpoint covers all the nodes. So, we > will need to rewrite new checkpoint even for this file when its nodes are > garbage collected... Yeah. In particular we'd nee to rewrite a new checkpoint when the block containing the old checkpoint was garbage-collected anyway. -- dwmw2