All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pci: Block config access during BIST
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 11:06:56 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1100995616.27157.44.camel@gaston> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <419FD58A.3010309@us.ibm.com>

On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 17:38 -0600, Brian King wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
> > Some of the Intel CPU's are very bad at lock handling so it is an issue.
> > Also most PCI config accesses nowdays go to onboard devices whose
> > behaviour may well be quite different to PCI anyway. PCI has become a
> > device management API.
> 
> Does this following patch address your issues with this patch, Alan?
> 
> It still doesn't address Greg's issue about making this apply to the
> pci_bus_* functions as well, but I'm not sure of a good way to do that
> due to the reasons given earlier.

Looks good to me, I don't sure we actually have to deal with pci_bus_*
functions, do we ? When are they called ?

> +void pci_block_config_access(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_lock, flags);
> +	dev->block_cfg_access = 1;
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_lock, flags);
> +}

Shouldn't we save the config space here ?

Ben.



  reply	other threads:[~2004-11-21  0:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-19 20:23 [PATCH 1/2] pci: Block config access during BIST brking
2004-11-19 21:32 ` Greg KH
2004-11-19 22:25   ` Brian King
2004-11-19 22:46     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-11-19 23:22       ` Brian King
2004-11-20  0:23         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-11-19 22:45   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-11-20  2:27 ` Alan Cox
2004-11-20  7:09   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-11-20 12:42     ` Alan Cox
2004-11-20 22:32       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-11-20 23:38       ` Brian King
2004-11-21  0:06         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2004-11-21  1:55           ` Brian King
2004-11-21  7:03             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-11-21 17:22               ` Brian King
2004-12-03 15:26                 ` Brian King
2004-11-24 11:49         ` Alan Cox
2004-11-25 22:00       ` Paul Mackerras
2004-11-25 21:11         ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1100995616.27157.44.camel@gaston \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=brking@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.