From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@kihontech.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm2-V0.7.29-0, and 30-9
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 16:47:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1101246438.1594.3.camel@krustophenia.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1101244924.32068.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 16:22 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Just curious to why you scale the interrupts from 49 down to 25. What
> would be wrong with keeping all of them at 49 (or whatever). Being a
> FIFO, no interrupt would preempt another. Why would you want the first
> IRQs to be registered have higher priority than (and thus will preempt)
> irqs registered later.
I raised this issue before. I agree that all interrupts should get the
same RT prio by default. Otherwise the default behavior is arbitrary.
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-23 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-22 16:06 [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm2-V0.7.30-2 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-11-22 22:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-22 21:21 ` K.R. Foley
2004-11-23 11:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-23 4:43 ` Adam Heath
2004-11-23 11:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-23 18:07 ` Adam Heath
2004-11-23 19:17 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm2-V0.7.29-0, and 30-9 Adam Heath
2004-11-23 21:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2004-11-23 21:47 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2004-11-23 22:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2004-11-24 3:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-24 4:06 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm2-V0.7.30-2 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-24 9:00 ` Adam Heath
2004-11-25 3:22 ` Adam Heath
2004-11-25 17:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-25 17:13 ` Adam Heath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1101246438.1594.3.camel@krustophenia.net \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@kihontech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.