From: "Martin Schlemmer [c]" <azarah@nosferatu.za.org>
To: astralstorm@gorzow.mm.pl
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>, "J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>,
Lista Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: cdrecord dev=ATA cannont scanbus as non-root [u]
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 23:50:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1102024252.11949.89.camel@nosferatu.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200412021723.48883.astralstorm@gorzow.mm.pl>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3378 bytes --]
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 17:23 +0100, Radoslaw Szkodzinski wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 of December 2004 22:16, Martin Schlemmer [c] wrote:
> > On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 08:16 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 29 2004, J.A. Magallon wrote:
> > > > dev=ATAPI uses ide-scsi interface, through /dev/sgX. And:
> > > > > scsibus: -1 target: -1 lun: -1
> > > > > Warning: Using ATA Packet interface.
> > > > > Warning: The related Linux kernel interface code seems to be
> > > > > unmaintained. Warning: There is absolutely NO DMA, operations thus
> > > > > are slow.
> > > >
> > > > dev=ATA uses direct IDE burning. Try that as root. In my box, as root:
> > >
> > > Oh no, not this again... Please check the facts: the ATAPI method uses
> > > the SG_IO ioctl, which is direct-to-device. It does _not_ go through
> > > /dev/sgX, unless you actually give /dev/sgX as the device name. It has
> > > nothing to do with ide-scsi. Period.
> > >
> > > ATA uses CDROM_SEND_PACKET. This has nothing to do with direct IDE
> > > burning, it's a crippled interface from the CDROM layer that should not
> > > be used for anything. scsi-linux-ata.c should be ripped from the
> > > cdrecord sources, or at least cdrecord should _never_ select that
> > > transport for 2.6 kernels. For 2.4 you are far better off using
> > > ide-scsi.
> > >
> > > > The scan through ATA lasts much less than with ATAPI, and you can burn
> > > > with dev=ATA:1,0,0 or dev=/dev/burner, which is the new recommended
> > > > way.
> > >
> > > No! ATAPI is the recommended way.
> >
> > Ok, so I am a bit confused here. We basically have 3 ways to use
> > cdrecord on linux-2.6 without ide-scsi:
> >
> > 1) cdrecord dev=/dev/hdx
> > 2) cdrecord dev=ATA
> > 3) cdrecord dev=ATAPI
> >
> > Now, if I run all three and grep for '^Warning', I get:
> >
> > -----
> > $ cdrecord dev=/dev/cdrw -scanbus 2>&1 | grep '^Warning'
> > Warning: Open by 'devname' is unintentional and not supported.
> > $ cdrecord dev=ATA -scanbus 2>&1 | grep '^Warning'
> > Warning: Using badly designed ATAPI via /dev/hd* interface.
> > $ cdrecord dev=ATAPI -scanbus 2>&1 | grep '^Warning'
> > Warning: Using ATA Packet interface.
> > Warning: The related Linux kernel interface code seems to be unmaintained.
> > Warning: There is absolutely NO DMA, operations thus are slow.
> > $
> > -----
> >
> > Which means:
> >
> > 1) dev=/dev/hdx - Open by 'devname' is unintentional and not supported.
> > 2) dev=ATA - Using badly designed ATAPI via /dev/hd* interface.
> > 3) dev=ATAPI - Using ATA Packet interface.
> > (And some nice things about it not being maintained and
> > slow)
> >
>
> Well, dev=ATA:nr,nr,nr will not produce any warning and works correctly with
> full performance.
> dev=ATAPI:* gives bad performance and as stated above, shouldn't be used.
> dev=/dev/hdx is just the same as dev=ATA:/dev/hdx, you can of course replace
> it with correct numbers if you know them or an alias
> in /etc/defaults/cdrecord.dfl (The path's from Gentoo, may be different
> elsewhere.)
Yes, I know .. its just that I have been under the impression (and also
what experience shows) that 'dev=/dev/hdx' and 'dev=ATA' is the same
thing, with 'dev=ATAPI' the depreciated one, but Jens stated differently
above ...
--
Martin Schlemmer
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-02 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-29 21:33 cdrecord dev=ATA cannont scanbus as non-root J.A. Magallon
2004-11-29 21:50 ` Jan Engelhardt
2004-11-29 21:59 ` J.A. Magallon
2004-11-30 6:51 ` Jan Engelhardt
2004-11-30 7:16 ` Jens Axboe
2004-11-30 16:29 ` J.A. Magallon
2004-11-30 17:12 ` J.A. Magallon
2004-11-30 17:37 ` Jan Engelhardt
2004-11-30 17:49 ` J.A. Magallon
2004-11-30 17:56 ` Jan Engelhardt
2004-11-30 18:29 ` J.A. Magallon
2004-12-01 21:16 ` cdrecord dev=ATA cannont scanbus as non-root [u] Martin Schlemmer [c]
2004-12-02 16:23 ` Radoslaw Szkodzinski
2004-12-02 21:50 ` Martin Schlemmer [c] [this message]
2004-12-03 7:35 ` Jan Engelhardt
2004-12-03 11:51 ` Rahul Karnik
2004-12-03 12:06 ` Jan Engelhardt
2004-12-03 12:10 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-01 21:56 ` cdrecord dev=ATA cannont scanbus as non-root Markus Plail
2004-12-02 8:07 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-02 12:51 ` J.A. Magallon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1102024252.11949.89.camel@nosferatu.lan \
--to=azarah@nosferatu.za.org \
--cc=astralstorm@gorzow.mm.pl \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=jamagallon@able.es \
--cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.