From: Paul Laufer <paul@laufernet.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] OSS sb_card.c: no need to include mca.h
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 16:40:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1102034445.2841.19.camel@trogdor.laufernet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041202005022.GF5148@stusta.de>
mca.h is not needed in sb_card.c in 2.6.
At one point I thought I would include the 2.4 MCA code in the sb_card.c
rewrite for 2.6. The file was rewritten due to the ISAPnP interface
changes that came in mid 2.5, and the ugly state of the 2.4 code. I
ended up leaving the MCA code out because I didn't have any machines to
test it on, and didn't know of anyone interested in testing it. It
should be fairly trivial to re-integrate. It was only a few tens of
lines and fairly self-contained if I recall correctly.
Note, I'm not on LKML at this time since I'm concentrating on my
Master's degree.
Also, this is the correct address to reach me at, as noted at the top of
sb_card.c. Linus rejected my CREDITS file patches the last few times I
sent them in, so the address there is invalid.
-Paul
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 01:50 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 11:38:47PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Mer, 2004-12-01 at 21:50, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > I didn't find any reason why this file includes mca.h .
> > >
> >
> > It certainly used to need it to build MCA bus soundblaster support.
> > Whether it still does in 2.6 I don't know. I assume you tried an MCA
> > build of OSS ?
>
> Yes, I did.
>
> And a
>
> grep -ri mca sound/oss/*
>
> only found false positives (nmcard_list, numcards).
>
> cu
> Adrian
>
--
Paul Laufer <paul@laufernet.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-03 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-01 21:50 [2.6 patch] OSS sb_card.c: no need to include mca.h Adrian Bunk
2004-12-01 23:38 ` Alan Cox
2004-12-02 0:50 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-12-03 0:40 ` Paul Laufer [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-25 7:48 Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1102034445.2841.19.camel@trogdor.laufernet.com \
--to=paul@laufernet.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.