From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261720AbULDP4b (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Dec 2004 10:56:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261728AbULDP4b (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Dec 2004 10:56:31 -0500 Received: from mahonia.com ([216.99.203.20]:60297 "EHLO mischief.mahonia.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261720AbULDP43 (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Dec 2004 10:56:29 -0500 Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.9-ac13 From: Mark McPherson Reply-To: mark@mahonia.com To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 07:56:27 -0800 Message-Id: <1102175787.10418.8.camel@mischief.mahonia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Here, at least, bzdiff tells me that the .bz2 patches for -ac12 and -ac13 are identical. And the byte counts in Alan's directory seem to be the same for these files. Could it be that the -ac12 patch set was inadvertently assembled and released again as -ac13? Cheers, Mark -- Mark McPherson