From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261362AbULETQZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Dec 2004 14:16:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261365AbULETQZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Dec 2004 14:16:25 -0500 Received: from clock-tower.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:56773 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261362AbULETQY (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Dec 2004 14:16:24 -0500 Subject: Re: Proposal for a userspace "architecture portability" library From: Alan Cox To: Paul Mackerras Cc: Linus Torvalds , David Woodhouse , David Howells , Linux Kernel Mailing List , libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <16818.23575.549824.733470@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <16818.23575.549824.733470@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1102270346.9242.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 18:12:28 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sul, 2004-12-05 at 00:53, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Now, clearly I can do this under the GPL. However, I think it would > be more useful to have the library under the LGPL, which requires > either getting the permission of the authors of the kernel files, or > rewriting them from scratch. Why not use the mozilla ones ? Some of them are kernel ones reused with permission and others are reimplementations but it has a fair set of functions.