From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261414AbULEXcn (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Dec 2004 18:32:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261425AbULEXcg (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Dec 2004 18:32:36 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:17366 "EHLO gate.crashing.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261420AbULEXap (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Dec 2004 18:30:45 -0500 Subject: Re: [linux-pm] swsusp-bigdiff: power-managment changes that are waiting in my tree From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Pavel Machek Cc: Nigel Cunningham , mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, Linux Kernel list , Linux-pm mailing list In-Reply-To: <20041205232440.GA1490@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20041205214910.GA1293@elf.ucw.cz> <1102284611.11763.97.camel@gaston> <20041205232440.GA1490@elf.ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 10:30:13 +1100 Message-Id: <1102289413.11761.110.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 00:24 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > We need to add pm_message_t to resume, I agree about that, but yes, it > would be quite bad if I added this, too. > > All changes I'm doing are "break nothing", because pm_message_t is > typedefed to u32 for now. Therefore they can be safely merged in any > order etc... Hrm... adding it to all resume, if done at once, won't break anything since nobody uses it yet. > For the documentation changes... I already rewrote that twice. I'm not > native english speaker and I need some sleep now. If you send me > nicely-looking diff, I'm likely to accept it :-). I'll think about it :) Ben.