From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261426AbULEXvU (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Dec 2004 18:51:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261427AbULEXvU (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Dec 2004 18:51:20 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:34774 "EHLO gate.crashing.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261426AbULEXvP (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Dec 2004 18:51:15 -0500 Subject: Re: [linux-pm] swsusp-bigdiff: power-managment changes that are waiting in my tree From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Pavel Machek Cc: Nigel Cunningham , mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, Linux Kernel list , Linux-pm mailing list In-Reply-To: <20041205233230.GC1490@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20041205214910.GA1293@elf.ucw.cz> <1102284611.11763.97.camel@gaston> <20041205232440.GA1490@elf.ucw.cz> <1102289413.11761.110.camel@gaston> <20041205233230.GC1490@elf.ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 10:50:45 +1100 Message-Id: <1102290645.11763.118.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 00:32 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > We need to add pm_message_t to resume, I agree about that, but yes, it > > > would be quite bad if I added this, too. > > > > > > All changes I'm doing are "break nothing", because pm_message_t is > > > typedefed to u32 for now. Therefore they can be safely merged in any > > > order etc... > > > > Hrm... adding it to all resume, if done at once, won't break anything > > since nobody uses it yet. > > "Done at once" is going to be a problem. I do not have that kind of > magical sed skills yet ;-). Me neither ... but I though you did :) Ben.