From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: BlueZ Mailing List <bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bluez-users] Thinkpad 560x with pnpbios and bluez
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 12:03:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1102590194.9988.121.camel@pegasus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58223.194.59.120.11.1102589549.squirrel@194.59.120.11>
Hi Volker,
> OK, here's what I did:
> --
> tar xvjf linux-2.4.22.tar.bz2
> cd linux-2.4.22
> zcat ../patch-2.4.22-ac4.gz |patch -p1
> --
> This is all good, and also leads to working kernel w/ pnpbios support :-)
>
> But then:
> --
> zcat ../patch-2.4.22-mh7.gz |patch -p1
> patching file arch/sparc64/kernel/ioctl32.c
> patching file CREDITS
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 2655 (offset 6 lines).
the CREDITS file can be ignored.
> patching file Documentation/Configure.help
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 14766 (offset 473 lines).
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 22494.
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 22719 (offset 671 lines).
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 22727 (offset 671 lines).
> Hunk #5 FAILED at 22741.
> Hunk #6 succeeded at 22808 (offset 662 lines).
> Hunk #7 succeeded at 22816 (offset 662 lines).
> Hunk #8 succeeded at 22853 (offset 662 lines).
> Hunk #9 succeeded at 27944 with fuzz 2 (offset 772 lines).
> 2 out of 9 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> Documentation/Configure.help.rej
Check the Configure.help.rej file, but this doesn't really matter. You
may miss some help text.
> patching file Documentation/devices.txt
> The next patch would create the file
> Documentation/firmware_class/firmware_sample_driver.c,
> which already exists! Assume -R? [n]
> Apply anyway? [n]
> Skipping patch.
> 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file
> Documentation/firmware_class/firmware_sample_driver.c.rej
> The next patch would create the file
> Documentation/firmware_class/hotplug-script,
> which already exists! Assume -R? [n]
> Apply anyway? [n]
> Skipping patch.
> 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file
> Documentation/firmware_class/hotplug-script.rej
> The next patch would create the file Documentation/firmware_class/README,
> which already exists! Assume -R? [n]
> Apply anyway? [n]
> Skipping patch.
> 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file
> Documentation/firmware_class/README.rej
So Alan took the firmware_class stuff. This collides, but you shouldn't
worry about it. You don't need it.
> patching file drivers/bluetooth/bfusb.c
> patching file drivers/bluetooth/bluecard_cs.c
> patching file drivers/bluetooth/bt3c_cs.c
> patching file drivers/bluetooth/btuart_cs.c
> patching file drivers/bluetooth/Config.in
> patching file drivers/bluetooth/dtl1_cs.c
> patching file drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcsp.c
> patching file drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c
> patching file drivers/bluetooth/hci_uart.h
> patching file drivers/bluetooth/hci_usb.c
> patching file drivers/bluetooth/hci_usb.h
> patching file drivers/bluetooth/Makefile.lib
> patching file drivers/input/Config.in
> patching file drivers/input/keybdev.c
> patching file drivers/input/Makefile
> patching file drivers/input/uinput.c
> patching file drivers/isdn/avmb1/capidrv.c
> patching file drivers/isdn/avmb1/kcapi.c
> patching file drivers/usb/hid-core.c
> patching file drivers/usb/hiddev.c
> The next patch would create the file include/linux/firmware.h,
> which already exists! Assume -R? [n]
> Apply anyway? [n]
> Skipping patch.
> 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file
> include/linux/firmware.h.rej
Again firmware_class.
> patching file include/linux/hiddev.h
> patching file include/linux/input.h
> patching file include/linux/uinput.h
> patching file include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h
> patching file include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> patching file include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
> patching file include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h
> patching file include/net/bluetooth/rfcomm.h
> patching file kernel/ksyms.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 50 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 586 (offset 14 lines).
This is also firmware_class.
> patching file lib/Config.in
> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
> Apply anyway? [n]
> Skipping patch.
> 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file lib/Config.in.rej
> The next patch would create the file lib/firmware_class.c,
> which already exists! Assume -R? [n]
> Apply anyway? [n]
> Skipping patch.
> 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file lib/firmware_class.c.rej
> patching file lib/Makefile
> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
> Apply anyway? [n]
> Skipping patch.
> 2 out of 2 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file lib/Makefile.rej
Again the firmware_class.
> patching file MAINTAINERS
> patching file Makefile
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 1.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.rej
This will fail of course. The -ac and the -mh EXTRAVERSION won't match.
> patching file net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c
> patching file net/bluetooth/bnep/core.c
> Hunk #12 FAILED at 472.
> Hunk #13 succeeded at 494 (offset -2 lines).
> Hunk #14 succeeded at 564 (offset -2 lines).
> Hunk #15 succeeded at 585 (offset -2 lines).
> 1 out of 15 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> net/bluetooth/bnep/core.c.rej
This is a problem. Look at the net/bluetooth/bnep/core.c.rej file.
> patching file net/bluetooth/bnep/sock.c
> patching file net/bluetooth/cmtp/sock.c
> patching file net/bluetooth/Config.in
> patching file net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
> patching file net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
> patching file net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> patching file net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
> patching file net/bluetooth/hidp/Config.in
> patching file net/bluetooth/hidp/core.c
> patching file net/bluetooth/hidp/hidp.h
> patching file net/bluetooth/hidp/Makefile
> patching file net/bluetooth/hidp/sock.c
> patching file net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
> patching file net/bluetooth/Makefile
> patching file net/bluetooth/rfcomm/core.c
> patching file net/bluetooth/rfcomm/tty.c
The rest looks fine. So unless you are using BNEP/PAN you won't get any
problems.
Regards
Marcel
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Bluez-users mailing list
Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-09 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-02 10:12 [Bluez-users] Thinkpad 560x with pnpbios and bluez Volker Jahns
2004-12-02 11:37 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-12-03 6:43 ` Volker Jahns
2004-12-03 6:58 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-12-03 7:11 ` Volker Jahns
2004-12-03 7:52 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-12-09 10:52 ` Volker Jahns
2004-12-09 11:03 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2004-12-14 8:33 ` Volker Jahns
2004-12-14 8:42 ` Marcel Holtmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1102590194.9988.121.camel@pegasus \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.