From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: RE: [PATCH] speedstep-centrino: Avoid returning zero freq on transient MSR values Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 13:16:24 -0800 Message-ID: <1102713384.686.70.camel@localhost> References: <88056F38E9E48644A0F562A38C64FB60038B2BFD@scsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <88056F38E9E48644A0F562A38C64FB60038B2BFD@scsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" Cc: davej@redhat.com, Dominik Brodowski , cpufreq list On Fri, 2004-12-10 at 10:37 -0800, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote: > Yes. These are Pentium 4 based processsors and with Enhanced Speedstep > on these processors, tsc rate will not change with CPU frequency change. Can the Pentium M not also change speed by itself? The documentation of the TM2 seems to say that it can. J