From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261267AbVABPmI (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:42:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261263AbVABPlG (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:41:06 -0500 Received: from clock-tower.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:48813 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261261AbVABPlA (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:41:00 -0500 Subject: Re: Questions about the CMD640 and RZ1000 bugfix support options From: Alan Cox To: Christoph Anton Mitterer Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <41D5D206.1040107@mathematica.scientia.net> References: <41D5D206.1040107@mathematica.scientia.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1104676209.15004.58.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 14:36:57 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Gwe, 2004-12-31 at 22:26, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > Hi. > > First of all: A happy new year in advance! > > Now to my question: > In the kernel-configuration there are the two options: > CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CMD640 CMD640 chipset bugfix/support > and > CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RZ1000 RZ1000 chipset bugfix/support > > At least the second of those two seems to cause some little slowdown > ("This may slow disk throughput by a few percent, but at least things They only trigger for the affected chipsets