From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Opperisano Subject: Re: transparent bridge troubles? Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 23:15:48 -0500 Message-ID: <1105157748.3501.7.camel@hubcap.ljm.dom> References: <7C9884991ADAE0479C14F10C858BCDF591E3AC@alderaan.smgtec.com> <005101c4f504$7be50f20$3e0010ac@esonet18> <20050107221822.GA1569@bender.817west.com> <006901c4f51a$b259a230$3e0010ac@esonet18> <1105149657.3501.2.camel@hubcap.ljm.dom> <00a701c4f535$a9415740$3e0010ac@esonet18> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <00a701c4f535$a9415740$3e0010ac@esonet18> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 22:53, mdpeters wrote: > Yes it did. Packets are flowing through with ACCEPT. So it is a problem with > QUEUE or something wrong with Snort-inline right? > > Snort-inline runs, and logs packets coming into the box but obviously the > packets are not making it through. since snort-inline is seeing the packets--i would say that the QUEUE part is working. the fact the the packets don't make it out of the box would point the finger towards a snort-inline problem. unfortunately--i don't know a thing about snort-inline; so i'm not of much use anymore. -j -- "Call this an unfair generalization if you must, but old people are no good at everything." --The Simpsons